Federalsist Paper #85

     In Hamilton's final paper he made one last appeal for the ratification of the Constitution pointing out that he had tried to stay rational and reasonable in his arguments avoiding emotional responses and typical political rhetoric. (Modern politicians could sure learn a lesson from that!) He reiterates that the Constitution was not perfect, but it was good and probably the best that could be done under the circumstances of the times (perhaps any time). Because it was not perfect, the allowance for amendments had been made, and adding them in the future would be more easily accomplished. Making those changes before ratification would actually make it a new document that would have to be approved by each state. Whereas after ratification, amendments could be added with the approval of just nine states. Also, the original Constitution had many specific details and provisions making it difficult to accommodate everyone. It had to be written in a way that all parties would agree. Future amendments would be dealing with a single proposal - political maneuvering and compromise would not be necessary.  Glenn Beck reminds us that through this amendment process we have been able to fix some of the original problems (i.e. slavery, women's suffrage, not to mention the Bill of Rights).
     Hamilton's final point is that a nation must have a national government. Writing the Constitution during a time of peace with the time to develop it properly, rather than during a time of turmoil when decisions are made in haste, and with the voluntary consent of the people is a miracle. (And just one more reason why it is what it is and so important that we follow and restore the proper balance of power that was spelled out in it).
   

Federalist Paper #11

     At the time these papers were written, the existing power nations were a little nervous of America's adventurous commercial character realizing what it was capable of, especially if it formed a decent Navy. Those nations would be rooting for America's division in order to stay on top in the commercial world. A Federal Navy would benefit the country, not only for protection, but also in influencing commercial relations with other nations. A strong navy would not be possible without remaining united. As a strong, united nation our friendship, or at least neutrality, would be greatly desired, influencing our abilities to trade in a favorable manner with other nations. Without that power we would be taken advantage of commercially, being forced to accept others' prices and tariffs, most likely losing profits. We would no doubt lose our adventurous spirit, be disgraced, and end in poverty.
     The ideas in this paper are as relevant today as they were at the time. By borrowing money we are losing our control having to bow down to others (China). Without keeping our military strong we can be easily taken advantage of, both politically and commercially.
   
 

Part One: A New Order for the Ages

Because the delegates were originally sent to Philadelphia with the purpose of amending the Articles of Confederation and came back with an entirely new governmental plan and a new Constitution they had a lot of justifying to do. The Federalists could have threatened the people with all kinds of consequences should the Constitution fail to be ratified. Instead they took the calm, logical approach (not done today too often) and addressed each of the legitimate objections, explaining why this was the best alternative. Publius argued in a civil tone avoiding personal attacks. He was trying to bring the country together, not divide and conquer (what a concept!). It was made clear that this document was being debated and recommended, not forced on the people.

Politicians by definition are a dividing force in society. Throughout our history our unity comes from our common values and virtues (which seem to be not so common anymore) not our politicians. Many of our values and virtues are voiced in our Declaration of Independence as well as the Constitution. Unity in Europe was different from our unity. It often came from royalty - all bowed before the king. Other forms of country unity comes from other forms of force.

Our system is by no means perfect, and the Constitution was almost not given a chance for that very reason. The sinful nature of imperfect man makes it impossible to create a perfect system, but if we hold true to our core principles petty partisan squabbles can be dealt with.